There is one common drawback to the reviews here - it is necessary to simulate a certain scene at home, and all lenses must also be programmed on it, so that you can see how different lenses behave when photographing in equal conditions, only then you can compare them with each other, otherwise it turns out that the top lens is from Leica is almost no different from Helios. well, and any trash like Helios 44 - all versions of pentacons, etc. the objective is definitely better than such objectives as the topcore 1.4 planar 1.4 for contax and bayonet ZE and ZF many fifty rubles 1.2. and for the same reason canon is in no hurry to make cameras larger than 21MP That's why Zeiss released Zeiss Otus 55mm f / 1.4 and set the price tag of 4000u.e - for 36MP. on 6Mr-12Mr most of the lenses are ideal, at 16-24Mr they float at 100% viewing (no detail. Sharpness is striking by 2 (at least shoot landscapes) detail at 21Mr (you increase the photo to 150%, but it does not drop), by the way about detailing. I sold all my trash with 1.2 types of Nikor (rare shit) of Revunen and Rocor (although it is excellent) When I tried it for the first time (I myself was skeptical before). but this lens is not for schoolchildren and gel enthusiasts 44 Price from 500 cu probably scares many away, especially the lens with F2. This is the best fifty kopeck who held in his hands
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |